The election of 2000 was historic, and the election of 2004 also had rumors of "irregularities". The coverage by Rolling Stone was excellent, while much of the mainstream media was too shy to really grab all of the facts and run with them. The 2008 film Recount keeps this issue in the public eye, where it deserves attention.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1000771/
Is looking into the irregularities and possible questionable practices of the Bush campaign and Diebold something that the Obama admin might add to their "To Do" list? As I have previously mentioned, Rolling Stone has been very persuasive in suggesting that both elections require another look from those in a position to do something about the potential evidence they may find. I read a blog posting once by someone who lived in Toledo, Ohio in 2004 who said local media reported finding abandoned cars with trucks full of votes for Kerry. Once re-elected, I am sure the Bush admin made those articles "disappear". When it comes to "Change" and "Hope" one thing I would like to add to the list are the misadventures of the 2000 and 2004 elections. Has anyone looked at the chart for Diebold, DBD, from 2000-2004 lately?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment